Last revised: December 26, 2024
By: Adam Burns
When the American Locomotive Company rolled out its Century Series in the early 1960s, the goal was straightforward: modernize Alco’s diesel catalog, correct the shortcomings of earlier models, and compete head-to-head with EMD and the rapidly rising General Electric. Among the first and most important of these new locomotives was the C424—a B-B (four-axle), 2,400-horsepower road-switcher intended to provide railroads with a versatile, modern freight locomotive at a time when power demands and expectations were climbing quickly.
Today, the ruggedness and reliability of these locomotives continues to show through as numerous examples of the C424 not only remained preserved but also are still used in freight service. Some locations where they can still be found hauling freight include the Western New York & Pennsylvania, Morristown & Erie, Buffalo Southern, and the Bath & Hammondsport Railroad.
Reading C424 #5201 and GP30 #3607 in freight service; May 6, 1972. Location not recorded. American-Rails.com collection.The C424 (listed by the builder as its DL640A) emerged as part of Alco’s effort to replace and improve upon earlier road-switcher concepts—particularly the RS-27, a model that sold in limited numbers and never gained broad traction. The Century line was meant to be more standardized, more maintainable, and more competitive in performance and price. In practice, the C424 was positioned as a lower-priced alternative to Alco’s own C425, while still offering strong horsepower for a four-axle unit in the mid-1960s market.
From a historian’s perspective, the C424 is especially interesting because it represents Alco’s “second wind” in road-switcher design—arriving at a moment when railroads were increasingly standardizing on EMD’s GP series and GE’s Universal line. In that competitive environment, even a technically capable locomotive faced an uphill battle if it couldn’t match the support networks, parts availability, and fleet commonality offered by the market leaders.
On the Belt Railway of Chicago the locomotives became a railfan favorite. The terminal road used its small fleet of six (#600-605) from the time they were purchased new from Alco in 1965-1966 until the early 2000's.
Fortunately the C424 sold better than its predecessor as a number of Class I railroads around the country picked up the model.
Additionally, smaller lines also purchased the design including Alco loyalists Green Bay & Western and Erie Mining while the Toledo, Peoria & Western also picked up a few units.
Unfortunately, while Alco sold nearly 200 C424s, 99 were built by the Montreal Locomotive Works for the Canadian Pacific, Canadian National, and Mexican line National de Mexico purchased another 45.
In general, most of the roads that bought the Alco C424 were returning customers, as the company could simply no longer attract new buyers and interest (which was mostly due to the fact that Alco still had a reputation for reliability issues despite having mostly corrected this problem years before).
Production ended on the model in early 1967 and despite the slow sales numbers (in comparison to models being produced by EMD who was selling thousands of GP35s and GP38s) the lines that purchased the C424 were generally quite happy with the models.
Alco did away with the notched corners on the C424s carbody, instead giving the nose a simple rounded look and the trailing long hood a raised edge for the number boards. At the heart of this model was Alco’s proven 251B diesel engine, delivering a rating of 2,400 horsepower. The locomotive rode on two-axle trucks (B-B), carried four GE 752 traction motors (despite GE being a major competitor by this time), and was offered with features railroads increasingly expected in mainline-capable road-switchers—such as multiple-unit capability and dynamic braking (where specified).
The C424 sold better than its predecessor as a number of Class Is picked up the model. Additionally, smaller lines also purchased the design including Alco loyalists Green Bay & Western and Erie Mining while the Toledo, Peoria & Western also picked up a few units. In general, most of the roads that bought the model were returning customers, as the company could simply no longer attract new buyers and interest by this time.
Despite their modest sales, several customers used theirs for many years. The Green Bay & Western and Belt Railway of Chicago both employed theirs for more than 20 years; the former's surviving until it was acquired by Wisconsin Central in 1993 and the latter's until later that decade (these examlples continue to find use on short line's today). Additionally, the Canadian Pacific was still employing their M424s in service through the early 1990s.
The C424 was built from April 1963 through May 1967, with a total production of 190 units. Importantly, it wasn’t solely a Schenectady product: C424s were constructed by Alco in the United States and by its Canadian affiliate, Montreal Locomotive Works (MLW).
| Entered Production | 5/1963 (Erie Lackawanna #2401) |
| Years Produced | 4/1963-5/1967 |
| Model Specification | DL640A |
| Engine | 251B, V-16 |
| Horsepower | 2,400 |
| RPM | 1,025 |
| Carbody Styling | Alco |
| Length (Between Coupler Pulling Faces) | 59' 4" (Originally 58' 10") |
| Weight | 260,000 Lbs. |
| Dynamic Brakes | Optional |
| Trucks | B-B |
| Truck Type | Swing Bolster, Drop-Side Equalizer (AAR Type-B) |
| Truck Wheelbase | 9' 4" |
| Wheel Size | 40" |
| Traction Motors | GE 752 (4) |
| Traction Generator | GT581 |
| Steam Generator | - |
| Gear Ratio | 65:18 |
| Tractive Effort Rating | 64,200 Lbs. |
| Top Speed | 75 MPH |
Total Built = 98
| Owner | Road Number(s) | Serial Number(s) | Date Built |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belt Railway of Chicago | 600 - 602 | 3382-05 to 07 | 4/1965 |
| Belt Railway of Chicago | 603 - 605 | 3450-01 to -03 | 4/1966 |
| Erie Lackawanna | 2401 - 2403 | 84543-84545 | 5/1963 |
| Erie Lackawanna | 2404 - 2415 | 84546-84557 | 6/1963 |
| Erie Mining Company | 500 | 3382-03 | 10/1964 |
| Green Bay & Western | 311 | 84559 | 9/1963 |
| Green Bay & Western | 312 | 3375-01 | 6/1964 |
| Green Bay & Western | 313, 314 | 3382-04, -08 | 1/1965, 9/1965 |
| Pennsylvania | 2415 | 84558 | 9/1963 |
| Reading | 5201 - 5203 | 84560-84562 | 10/1963 |
| Reading | 5204 - 5210 | 84733-84739 | 10/1963 - 11/1963 |
| Spokane, Portland & Seattle | 300 - 306 | 6/1964 | |
| Toledo, Peoria & Western | 800 - 801 | 9/1964 | |
| Wabash Railroad | B900 - B902* | 3372-01 to -03 | 3/1964 |
| Wabash Railroad | B903 - B906* | 3372-04 to -07 | 3/1964 |
* The Wabash Railroad's seven C424's, #B900-B906, were originally ordered for the Ferrocarril Nacional de México (NdeM) and expected to become #8000-8006 (construction numbers 3372-1 thru 3372-7).
However, through a lease-purchase contract they were sent to the Wabash and eventually became Norfolk & Western #3900-3906. Afterwards, NdeM acquired seven additional C424's, construction numbers S-3380-1 thru S-3380-7 (#8100-8106).
By this time Alco's construction numbering system had changed from a five-digit number (in sequential order of completion) to a Sales Number along with however many locomotives a customer ordered.
Total Built = 92
| Owner | Road Number(s) | Construction Number(s) | Completion Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Pacific | 8300 | 84413 | 4/1963 |
| Canadian National | 3200-3201 | 84837-84838 | 12/1964 |
| Canadian Pacific | 4200-4232 | 84839-84870 | 3/1965-8/1965 |
| Canadian Pacific | 4233-4250 | 3436-01 thru 3436-18 | 12/1965-3/1966 |
| Canadian National | 3202-3205 | 3443-01 thru 3443-04 | 3/1966-5/1966 |
| Canadian National | 3206-3221 | 3444-01 thru 3443-16 | 5/1966-8/1966 |
| Canadian National | 3222-3228 | 3477-01 thru 3477-07 | 1/1967-2/1967 |
| Canadian National | 3229-3240 | 3478-01 thru 3478-12 | 2/1967-5/1967 |
Green Bay & Western C424's #312 and #314 layover in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin on April 24, 1974. American-Rails.com collection.From a research standpoint, one of the most important interpretive points is the relationship between the C424 and the C425. The C425 (2,500 hp) is often described as an upgraded evolution of the C424 concept, reflecting Alco’s attempts to refine the product for specific railroad preferences. In practice, railroads that were comparing orders during the mid-1960s were not just choosing horsepower—they were choosing long-term standardization, support, and perceived reliability. That broader purchasing logic is one reason Alco struggled, even when its locomotives could perform.
Like many Alcos, the C424’s later years were shaped by the economic realities of parts supply, shop familiarity, and corporate change. As Class I rosters consolidated and standardized, Alco products were often traded, retired, or sold off earlier than equivalent EMD power—not always because they were “bad locomotives,” but because fleet commonality and corporate procurement dynamics strongly favored EMD and GE.
Yet the C424 has enjoyed a meaningful afterlife on short lines, regionals, and industrial operators, where purchase price and rugged tractive performance could outweigh concerns about standardization. Some examples remained active long after their original owners retired them, and a small number are preserved.
Jan 29, 26 02:21 PM
Jan 29, 26 01:00 PM
Jan 29, 26 12:50 PM
Jan 29, 26 12:46 PM
Jan 29, 26 12:39 PM
Jan 29, 26 11:12 AM
Jan 29, 26 11:05 AM
Jan 28, 26 11:47 PM
Jan 28, 26 11:30 PM
Jan 28, 26 12:29 PM
Jan 28, 26 12:23 PM
Jan 28, 26 11:18 AM
Jan 28, 26 11:08 AM
Jan 28, 26 11:05 AM
Jan 28, 26 11:04 AM
Jan 28, 26 10:59 AM
Jan 28, 26 10:57 AM
Jan 28, 26 10:51 AM
Jan 27, 26 10:03 PM
Jan 27, 26 02:49 PM
Jan 27, 26 02:40 PM
Jan 27, 26 01:19 PM
Jan 27, 26 01:10 PM
Jan 27, 26 12:05 PM
Jan 27, 26 11:57 AM
Jan 27, 26 10:22 AM
Jan 27, 26 09:44 AM
Jan 26, 26 01:21 PM
Jan 26, 26 01:15 PM
Jan 26, 26 12:48 PM
Jan 26, 26 12:40 PM
Jan 26, 26 12:36 PM
Jan 26, 26 12:25 PM
Jan 26, 26 12:07 PM
Jan 26, 26 12:44 AM
Jan 25, 26 01:41 PM
Jan 25, 26 01:37 PM
Jan 25, 26 01:34 PM
Jan 25, 26 01:25 PM
Jan 25, 26 01:18 PM
Jan 25, 26 01:13 PM
Jan 25, 26 01:02 PM
Jan 25, 26 12:59 PM
Jan 24, 26 12:53 PM
Jan 24, 26 12:46 PM
Jan 24, 26 12:40 PM
Jan 24, 26 12:34 PM
Jan 24, 26 12:30 PM
Jan 24, 26 12:26 PM
Jan 24, 26 12:21 PM