American Locomotive Company, "Alco"

The American Locomotive Company, also known as Alco, at one time was one of the two preeminent locomotive builders in the country behind only Baldwin Locomotive Works. Of course, this was the days of steam locomotives and while Alco would eventually build more than 75,000 locomotives (most of which were steamers) its success in the diesel era was not quite as impressive. And, even though Alco would fold as its diesel sales fell in the 1960s and fell to third place behind General Electric, the company would produce some of the most unique and interesting models to ever roam the rails. Interestingly, as a testament to Alco's manufacturing techniques several of its models built as early as the late 1930s continue to operate today, some still in revenue service on shortlines.

The American Locomotive Company was actually formed through the combination of several smaller companies in 1901. These companies included the Dickson Manufacturing Company, Brooks Locomotive Works, Cooke Locomotive and Machine Works, Schenectady Locomotive Works, Manchester Locomotive Works, Richmond Locomotive Works,Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works, and Rhode Island Locomotive Works. Three years later in 1904 the company acquired the Locomotive and Machine Company of Montreal, renaming it the Montreal Locomotive Works (MLW). Except for the Montreal plant and the Schenectady, New York operation all other predecessor facilities were closed with the company's main headquarters being located in Schenectady.

For more reading regarding the history of Alco please click here.  Alco quickly gained a reputation for not only building high quality steam locomotives but also incorporating new technologies into its designs. While Alco built scores of early steamers such as 2-8-0 Consolidations and 4-6-0 Ten-Wheelers, the builder was perhaps most famous for some of the later wheel arrangements it manufactured such as the 2-8-4 Berkshires, 4-6-4 Hudsons, 4-8-4 Northerns and others. Alco also would build several of the massive articulated designs such as Union Pacific's 4-6-6-4 Challengers and the behemoth 4-8-8-4 Big Boy. In 1930 Alco produced the first steam locomotive, a 4-8-4 Northern, to operate with rolling bearings in conjunction with the Timken Roller Bearing Company which considerably reduced maintenance and wear on a locomotive's running gear, especially the axles.

While the company was most successful building steam locomotives it is perhaps best remembered for its diesel locomotives. Diesel-electric locomotives have been around in one shape or form since the mid-1920s when Alco jump started the market for them. The company joined with General Electric and Ingersoll-Rand to produce a 300 hp, 60-ton model in 1924 that would be purchased by the Central Railroad of New Jersey, followed by the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad. During the 1930s Alco was at the leading edge of diesel locomotive technology, which is rather ironic considering it would slowly fall behind and lose market share to both General Electric and GM's Electro-Motive Division in the following decades.

The American Locomotive Company's first true production diesel locomotive was the DL-103 (the "DL" stood for diesel locomotive), a streamlined end-cab design similar to then-EMC's (the Electro-Motive Corporation, before it became a division of General Motors) EA model of 1937. However, unlike the EA the DL-103 was neither as reliable or as aesthetically well-defined, with a much longer, and lower nose. The unit used Alco's 539T prime mover, which was a four-stroke diesel that produced 2,000 horsepower. Eventually Alco would produce four different models, which varied slightly. Aside from the DL-103 they included the DL-105, DL-107, and DL-109 (which was the most successful garnering 62 units produced). Alco also produced two models of cabless "B" units the DL-108 and DL-110 that only saw four total sales.

In all the DL series was unsuccessful selling only 78 A and B units total, and was a microcosm of Alco's problems with main line passenger and freight diesel locomotives. Railroads often found the company's prime movers, particularly the 539 (which the DL-100 series was powered with), 241, and 244 models unreliable, troublesome, and rather complicated to maintain. Even in later years when Alco developed a more reliable prime mover, the model 251 it appears the damage was already done amongst railroads.  Clearly, Alco's most successful diesel locomotive lines were its switchers and early road-switchers, beginning with the S-1 and RS-1 models. The S-1 was listed in Alco's catalog in 1940 while the RS-1 followed a year later. The S series (the "S" stood for switcher) would wind up selling over 3,000 units by the time production ended while the RS series (the "RS" stood for road switcher) would sell nearly 1,800.

What is ironic is that the S series models (of which there were four built the S-1, S-2, S-3, and S-4 with all being very similar) used Alco's troublesome 539 model prime mover and the RS series (the RS-1, RS-2, and RS-3) was powered with the likewise fickle 244 model. However, these engines performed well in Alco's smaller switcher models but not so in the main line models like the PA and FA.  Alco's PA and FA models (the PA was the passenger model while the FA was for freight service) debuted in 1946 and were the company's answer to EMD's wildly successful E and F series cab units. Unfortunately, they were equipped with Alco's new 244 model prime mover which was meant to replace the troublesome 539.

The engine had been rushed into production and proved to be just as unreliable as the 539. The FA would go on to sell just over 800 units while the PA, despite being one of the most beautiful diesel locomotive designs ever conceived, sold just over 200 units. Both models were later re-engined with Alco's much more reliable 251 model but by that point the damage of the company's reputation had already been done with two failed prime mover designs.  In the early 1960s the American Locomotive Company made one final attempt to keep a respectable market share in the locomotive industry by unveiling its Century series, which were main line freight units of B-B and C-C trucks (four and six axles). By this time General Electric had already taken over second place from Alco after ending its relationship with the company in 1950 (before that time both corporations teamed up to produce diesel locomotives).  In 1963 Alco introduced the C-420 and C-628 (the first number designated the number of wheels per truck and the second the horsepower, so a C-425 had four wheels, or a B-B truck, and 2,500 horsepower) to compete with GE's relatively new Universal series and EMD's soon-to-be-released second generation models like the SD35 (which entered EMD's catalog in 1964). 

American Locomotive Company Diesel Models

DL Series

Model Type Units Built Date Built Horsepower

S Series

Model Type Units Built Date Built Horsepower
S-57 (Built for B&M)1954800

RS Series

Model Type Units Built Date Built Horsepower

FA Series

Model Type Units Built Date Built Horsepower

PA Series

Model Type Units Built Date Built Horsepower

Century Series

Model Type Units Built Date Built Horsepower
C-643DH3 (Built For SP)19644,300
C-8553 (Built For UP)19645,500

While the new models were equipped with Alco's much more reliable 251 prime mover (more specifically the 251C) the damage to the company's reputation of unreliable locomotives had already been done. In total the C-400 series sold just 297 units while the C-600 series sold 348. In comparison, EMD's original SD40 model of 1966 outsold both models by more than two-fold at 1,257 units.  With the Century series unsuccessful the American Locomotive Company gave up on the locomotive market and closed its Schenectady operation in 1969. The company's locomotive designs were sold to its Montreal Locomotive Works division (which was eventually purchased by Bombardier in 1975 and merged into the company by the 1985) and its engine schematics would eventually wind up with Fairbanks-Morse, a one-time diesel locomotive manufacturer itself, which continues to build Alco-inspired engines to this day.  Finally, this article provides interesting insight into the differences between Alco and EMD diesels.

Top Of Page

› Alco
› Alco

Photography Featured On This Site

Loyd Lowry Photography
Wade Massie
Ron Flanary

Popular Train Ride Events

Collections Presented Here