Chicago Transit Overhaul: RTA To Become The Northern Illinois Transit Authority

Published: February 16, 2026

Chicago - Later this year, on June 1st, the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA)—the umbrella agency that plans and funds public transportation across the Chicago region—will be reorganized into a new entity: the Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA). The change is the centerpiece of a sweeping state transit package signed by Gov. J.B. Pritzker in December 2025, aimed at stabilizing Chicagoland transit finances and giving the region stronger tools to coordinate service, fares, and accountability across CTA, Metra, and Pace.

Metra F40PHM-2 #211 departs Chicago just west of Milepost 1 on April 19, 2004. Wade Massie photo.

Why Illinois is doing this now

State leaders and transit advocates have been warning for more than a year that the region faced a “fiscal cliff” as federal pandemic-era relief dollars ran out—threatening major service reductions if new revenue and governance reforms weren’t adopted. The new law is designed to avert that scenario by pairing major new ongoing funding with structural reforms intended to make the system operate more like a coordinated regional network rather than three largely separate silos.

The package is often summarized in two parts:

A new governance model under NITA that replaces the RTA, with expanded authority to coordinate and enforce regionwide priorities.
A new revenue and investment framework—described in state materials as roughly $1.5 billion in annual funding to stabilize transit systems and support improvements—without raising statewide tax rates.

What changes when NITA replaces the RTA

NITA is designed to be a stronger successor to the RTA, with new leverage to push integration and performance outcomes across the region’s transit providers. Among the most notable policy goals included in reporting and official summaries:

Integrated fares and easier transfers. Plans call for a move toward a unified fare collection approach regionwide over the coming years, so riders can navigate CTA, Metra, and Pace more seamlessly.
More system coordination. The law’s framework emphasizes schedule coordination and network planning across service boards—an area where the RTA historically had limited direct control.
Accountability and transparency. The new structure includes stronger oversight expectations—regular auditing and performance-based approaches to funding are repeatedly highlighted as key reforms.
Safety and rider experience initiatives. Coverage of the law describes measures such as enhanced coordination with law enforcement and other safety programs, along with additional reporting tools for riders.

Exactly how those priorities translate into day-to-day rider impacts—service levels, on-time performance, capital project sequencing—will depend heavily on implementation decisions made during the transition period.

When It Happens

The legislation sets a formal path to replace the RTA with NITA, with key milestones beginning on June 1, 2026 according to Railfan & Railroad. The RTA itself has published a transition-focused timeline and “what happens next” explainer describing upcoming deadlines and the steps required to stand up the new authority.

The financial foundation

At the heart of the package is ongoing funding intended to prevent steep cuts and enable service improvements. State and media summaries describe a mix of revenue sources—such as reallocations tied to motor fuel sales tax and other statewide transportation-related revenues, plus changes to sales tax treatment in northeastern Illinois—structured to support both the Chicago region and transit needs elsewhere in Illinois.

Planning groups and civic watchdogs have generally framed the package as a major step, while also warning that a large transition like this inevitably creates “implementation risk”—the details of governance, metrics, and inter-agency coordination will matter as much as the law’s headline numbers.

A brief history: the RTA and its commuter-rail role (leading to Metra)

While CTA has existed in various forms since the mid-20th century, the modern structure of Chicagoland’s regional transit governance was forged during a crisis in the 1970s—especially for commuter rail.

1974: RTA created to keep transit—and commuter trains—running

The Illinois General Assembly created the Regional Transportation Authority in 1974 to coordinate and fund public transportation across the six-county Chicago area. One urgent driver was commuter rail: private railroads that had long operated suburban trains were increasingly unwilling to shoulder ongoing passenger losses without public support.

In its early years, the RTA supported commuter service through contracts and subsidies, helping preserve a network of routes radiating from downtown terminals like Union Station and LaSalle Street Station—services that were essential to daily commuting patterns even as railroad finances deteriorated.

Early 1980s: RTA moves toward direct commuter-rail management

As financial pressures continued—along with major railroad bankruptcies in the region—Illinois and the RTA increasingly needed a more formal structure dedicated to commuter rail. The “About Metra” history notes that the RTA framework evolved to ensure continued service and governance as the region modernized commuter rail oversight.

1984–1985: Metra emerges as the commuter rail identity

The major turning point came in the mid-1980s:

1984: The commuter rail system that would become Metra was established as the region’s dedicated commuter rail agency.
1985: The unified Metra brand was adopted, giving a single public identity to multiple lines that still largely ran on freight railroad infrastructure and, in many cases, were operated through agreements with freight railroads.

Importantly, Metra is owned by the RTA (and, under the new law, will fall under the reorganized NITA framework rather than the RTA).

What “RTA commuter rail” really meant in practice

For decades, the RTA’s commuter-rail role has been less about dispatching trains directly and more about the “big system” functions—regional planning, capital programming, and funding allocation—that support commuter rail as a public service. Meanwhile, Metra has served as the region’s dedicated commuter rail operator/manager, overseeing service on a vast network of lines and stations across the Chicago metro area.

Moving Forward

As the RTA transitions into NITA later this year, Chicagoland riders and transit watchers will be focused on a few early indicators:

How quickly NITA can translate “integration” into rider-facing improvements (simpler fares, better timed transfers, coordinated schedules).
Whether new funding and performance expectations actually increase reliability and safety, rather than merely preventing service reductions.
How the new authority balances city and suburban priorities—a recurring theme in the debate leading up to passage.

For a region whose economy depends on the daily movement of millions of people, the shift from RTA to NITA is being framed not as a simple rebrand, but as a once-in-a-generation attempt to modernize how northeastern Illinois plans, funds, and manages its transit network.