Home
Fallen Flags
Santa Fe-Southern Pacific (SPSF Railway)

Santa Fe-Southern Pacific Railroad: Merger, History, Paint Scheme

Last revised: September 23, 2024

The failed merger between the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (often referred to simply as the Santa Fe) and the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Southern Pacific) represents a significant chapter in the history of American railroads.

This narrative includes not just two storied railroads, but also the regulatory environment, market conditions, and strategic ambitions that shaped their story.

In a stunning move, the Interstate Commerce Commission denied the merger in 1986, mandating that the companies disentangle their operations within two years.

Consequently, in October 1988, Southern Pacific was sold to Rio Grande Industries for $1.02 billion. Meanwhile, the merger’s resulting real estate assets in California were spun off into Catellus Development Corporation, which soon rose to prominence as the state’s largest private landowner.

The original holding company rebranded itself as Santa Fe Pacific Corporation, retaining ownership of the Santa Fe Railway and the diverse non-rail assets of both predecessor companies.

Santa Fe SD45u #5344; June, 1986. The locomotive is wearing the so-called "Kodachrome" paint scheme for the intended merger with Southern Pacific which was denied by the ICC that year. American-Rails.com collection.

Historical Background

Both the Santa Fe and Southern Pacific railroads were giants in the American railway industry, each with a rich history dating back to the 19th century.

- **Santa Fe Railway**: Founded in 1859, the Santa Fe Railway was instrumental in the development of the western United States. Renowned for its passenger services and extensive freight operations, its iconic red and silver locomotives became a symbol of railroading excellence.

- **Southern Pacific**: Established in 1865, Southern Pacific covered vast stretches of the western U.S. and was crucial in the development of California. Its diverse operations included not just rail transport but also trucking and telecommunications.

As the 20th century progressed, both railroads sought to maintain profitability amidst rising competition from other modes of transportation, particularly trucks and ships.

Combining resources through a merger was seen as a strategic move to solidify market positions, reduce operational redundancies, and better compete against emerging transportation challenges.

The Merger Proposal

In a dramatic tale of corporate ambition and regulatory reality, the proposed merger of two major railroads in the Western United States—the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway, and the Southern Pacific Railroad—unfolded in the mid-1980s.

Announced in September 1983, this $5 billion venture aimed to consolidate the rail networks under a new holding company, the Santa Fe Southern Pacific Corporation.

By December of that year, the companies had already merged their extensive non-rail assets, although the Southern Pacific Railroad continued to operate independently within a voting trust during the ongoing regulatory review.

Confident of regulatory approval, the two companies jointly petitioned the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) for clearance in March 1984. Anticipating a positive outcome, they even began repainting their locomotives into a unified livery for a new "SPSF" railroad.

The merger aimed to create a powerful, integrated transportation network across the western United States, boosting efficiency and service quality.

This union was anticipated to save a staggering $760 million annually by eliminating duplicated operations, enhancing route rationalization, and leveraging combined capital investments.

Regulatory Environment and Challenges

Regulatory oversight fell squarely on the shoulders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), the federal agency responsible for railroad mergers.

The ICC evaluated such mergers based on several criteria, including the potential for reducing competition, possible service improvements, overall public interest, and financial viability.

From the onset, the merger faced significant regulatory scrutiny. There were substantial concerns about the potential monopolistic effects of the merger, particularly in regions where Santa Fe and Southern Pacific’s operations overlapped.

The combination of these two major players could stifle competition significantly in the western U.S., leading to higher rates for shippers and diminished service options.

Numerous stakeholders voiced their opposition, including shippers, competing railroads, and state regulators. Shippers feared that reduced competition would lead to increased freight rates. Competing railroads worried about the looming giant’s market power and its ability to push them out of business.

ICC Decision and Implications

The ICC's decision process was rigorous and lengthy, lasting several years. The central question was whether the proposed merger would harm the public by reducing competition and restricting service options. On July 24, 1986, the ICC delivered its final decision: the merger was denied.

Key points in the ICC’s decision included:

- **Anticompetitive Concerns**: The merger would have created a virtual monopoly in several regions, significantly reducing competition. The ICC was particularly concerned about reduced options for shippers in key markets where Santa Fe and Southern Pacific routes overlapped.

- **Service Quality**: Although the merger promised improved service quality through operational efficiencies, the ICC believed that these potential benefits were outweighed by the negative impact of reduced competition. The merger could result in higher costs and fewer service choices for businesses relying on freight rail.

- **Public Interest**: The ICC concluded that the merger was not in the public interest. The potential for increased freight rates and diminished service quality was deemed too great a risk.

Aftermath and Strategic Reorientation

Following the ICC’s denial, both Santa Fe and Southern Pacific had to revisit their strategic roadmaps. The decision was a significant blow to their aspirations of creating a dominant western U.S. railroad network. However, both companies were resilient and sought alternative paths to competitiveness.

**Santa Fe**:

- The Santa Fe continued to operate independently but faced mounting financial pressures. In 1995, the Santa Fe found a new merger partner in the Burlington Northern Railroad.

The merger was successful, creating the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (now BNSF Railway), which emerged as one of the largest and most efficient railroads in North America.

The ICC approved this merger, noting it would enhance competition by creating a robust competitor to the Union Pacific Railroad.

**Southern Pacific**:

- After the failed merger, Southern Pacific struggled to maintain its market position. It faced significant financial challenges, exacerbated by competition and operational inefficiencies.

In 1996, Southern Pacific was acquired by Union Pacific Railroad, creating the largest railroad network in the UnitedStates. The ICC approved this acquisition, considering it a necessary move to stabilize Southern Pacific’s operations and enhance service in the western U.S.

Santa Fe SD45u #5394 in the Santa Fe–Southern Pacific's railfan-coined "Kodachrome" livery near Venus, Texas; August, 1985. Mike Bledsoe photo. American-Rails.com collection.

"Shouldn't Paint So Fast"

During the proposed merger the new Santa Fe Southern Pacific Corporation felt so strongly the merger would be approved that it began repainting locomotives.

This new unified paint scheme was designed to represent the impending SPSF Railway. Legally mandated to operate independently until the merger received full approval, the locomotives bore the initials SP or SF, with space reserved to add the remaining letters post-merger.

The redesigned livery merged elements from both railroads. It drew inspiration from the Santa Fe's "Yellowbonnet" design, featuring a distinguished red stripe on the locomotive's nose.

The rest of the body sported SP's signature scarlet red, reminiscent of their "Bloody Nose" scheme, accented with a black roof extending to the lower sections of the radiator grills.

The number boards were distinctly red with white numerals, and large block letters "SP" or "SF" prominently adorned the sides.

Interestingly, this color scheme bore a striking resemblance to the packaging of Kodak's Kodachrome film, widely used by rail enthusiasts at the time.

Consequently, the paint scheme earned the nickname "Kodachrome." Following the ICC's unexpected denial of the merger, industry insiders and railfans humorously remarked that SPSF stood for "Shouldn't Paint So Fast."

To showcase the envisioned unified appearance, two Santa Fe SD45-2s locomotives (#7219 and #7221) were fully painted with the SPSF lettering. Similarly, one Santa Fe caboose was adorned with "SPSF" in anticipation of the merger.

By the time the merger was denied, a significant portion of the fleet had been repainted that included:

306 Santa Fe locomotives
4 Santa Fe cabooses
10 Santa Fe slugs
96 Southern Pacific locomotives
1 Southern Pacific caboose

Following the regulatory decision, both railroads undertook efforts to revert their locomotives to their standard paint schemes.

Santa Fe managed to repaint all its Kodachrome locomotives by 1990. In contrast, Southern Pacific's repaints progressed more slowly, with some of the Kodachrome units remaining operational within the Union Pacific roster post-SP acquisition.

Notably, a GP9 in the Kodachrome livery (ex-SP 2873) has been preserved at the Western Pacific Railroad Museum in Portola, California, serving as a colorful relic of this ambitious but unrealized merger.

Broader Impact on the Railroad Industry

The failed Santa Fe–Southern Pacific merger had broader implications for the railroad industry, influencing future merger activities and regulatory policies.

**Regulatory Environment**:

- The ICC’s stringent review process highlighted regulatory concerns about industry consolidation's anticompetitive effects. It set a precedent that future rail mergers would need to demonstrate clear benefits outweighing any potential reduction in competition. This decision became a reference point for subsequent railroad mergers and acquisitions.

**Industry Landscape**:

- The denial reshaped the competitive landscape. While the mega-merger was halted, the subsequent successful mergers involving Burlington Northern, Santa Fe, Union Pacific, and Southern Pacific ultimately led to a more consolidated industry, with fewer but larger and financially stable railroads.

This consolidation helped streamline operations, improve service efficiencies, and enhance competitive capacities against other transport modes.

**Strategic Realignments**:

- Railroads recognized the need for strategic realignments to stay competitive. This included investments in technology, infrastructure improvements, and service quality enhancements. The focus shifted from expanding networks through mergers to optimizing existing operations and enhancing customer service.

**Customer and Market Focus**:

- Shippers and other stakeholders in the freight transportation ecosystem benefited from heightened awareness about the impacts of consolidation. The need for competitive pricing and reliable service became more pronounced, driving railroads to focus on customer-centric approaches and innovative logistics solutions.

Legacy and Lessons

Despite its failure, the attempted merger between Santa Fe and Southern Pacific left a lasting legacy on the rail industry. Several key lessons emerged from this episode:

**Regulatory Oversight**:

- The ICC’s decision underscored the importance of regulatory oversight in maintaining competitive balance. Future merger proposals would need to address competition concerns comprehensively and demonstrate substantial public benefits.

**Strategic Adaptability**:

- Railroads learned the importance of strategic adaptability. When immediate merger opportunities are not feasible, railroads can still pursue competitiveness through operational efficiencies, technological advancements, and improved customer relations.

**Market Dynamics**:

- The attempted merger highlighted the dynamic nature of market forces in transportation. Railroads needed to respond to shifting market conditions, evolving customer needs, and competitive pressures from other transport modes to remain viable and profitable.

Conclusion

The story of the Santa Fe–Southern Pacific merger is a testament to the complexities of railroad consolidation, regulatory scrutiny, and strategic adaptability. While the merger itself was unsuccessful, the paths taken by Santa Fe and Southern Pacific post-merger denial significantly reshaped the railroad industry.

Their efforts demonstrated resilience and strategic foresight, ultimately leading to the formation of major railroad entities that dominate the American landscape today.

In reflection, the failed merger serves as a pivotal case study in understanding the balance between consolidation and competition in a critical industry that continues to drive economic growth and connectivity across vast regions.

The legacy of the Santa Fe–Southern Pacific merger underscores the enduring importance of regulatory oversight, market adaptability, and strategic vision in navigating the complex terrain of railroad operations.